I don't think this book will get a positive response from the physics community because established beliefs are hard to break. Since most physicists do not feel the need to question theories such as the Big Bang and Relativity these theories have now become established beliefs. There is such a strong belief in the field of physics that these theories are true that almost all phenomena and events in the Universe are tried to be explained based on these theories.
The Hypothesis of the Primitive Atom (commonly known as the Big Bang Theory) put forward by Belgian Jesuit priest and physicist Georges Lemaître in 1927 and which argues that the Universe was formed by expanding from a tiny extremely hot and very dense point is not actually a scientific theory but is a science fiction scenario that tries to fit science into biblical belief. So is the Oscillating Universe Theory proposed by Albert Einstein in 1930 inspired by Georges Lemaître which is very similar to The Hypothesis of the Primitive Atom but with constant "big bangs" and "big crunches".
Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity on the other hand has turned into a theory among physicists whose accuracy is meaningless to even question. Most of the experiments that test these theories are done to prove their truth not their falsity. Today a physicist or astronomer who does not approve of Lemaître's and Einstein's theories cannot gain an important place in scientific circles and the views of a scientist who tries to explain the Universe without approving these theories are not given much importance. Because opposing these theories has become almost synonymous with opposing science.
Therefore the biggest problem of a significant part of today's physicists is not trying to explain scientifically how the Universe came into being but trying to fit science into how God created the Universe. However all these theories are no longer sufficient to explain the Universe. This leads to fictionalism blocking the way for science. For this reason many physicists produce sci-fi scenarios in competition with each other. The interesting thing is that they themselves believe that the scenarios they produce are scientific theories.
In this book you will read a broad critique of these theories that have become established beliefs in today's physical science and the theories I have put forward against them. I did not make any mathematical explanations while creating these theories. Because the theories of physics can and should be explained without using mathematics provided that they are based on observation and experimental data. For this reason I verbally explained the theories I created on the basis of quantum physics adhering only to observation and experimental data.